<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Games 5 &amp; 6 Analytics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gashousegraphs.com/2011/04/06/games-5-6-analytics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gashousegraphs.com/2011/04/06/games-5-6-analytics/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:52:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://gashousegraphs.com/2011/04/06/games-5-6-analytics/#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 04:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gashousegraphs.com/?p=3047#comment-698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;re right. There&#039;s no point in panicking six days into the season... but I do think the fan base is extra sensitive given the inconsistent nature of the offense in 2010.

The good news is that they are walking at a decent rate (10.4%) and putting the ball in play better than most teams (16% K rate). Unfortunately, they&#039;ve had a difficult time elevating the ball as you pointed out the other day. FanGraphs lists their batted ball data: 

GB 55.9% (1/30)
FB 28.7% (30/30)
LD 15.4% (23/30)

So they&#039;ve hit the highest percentage of ground balls, but the fewest fly balls (of which only 4.7% have been HR)... and not very many line drives. No wonder they&#039;ve been so boring to watch/follow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right. There&#8217;s no point in panicking six days into the season&#8230; but I do think the fan base is extra sensitive given the inconsistent nature of the offense in 2010.</p>
<p>The good news is that they are walking at a decent rate (10.4%) and putting the ball in play better than most teams (16% K rate). Unfortunately, they&#8217;ve had a difficult time elevating the ball as you pointed out the other day. FanGraphs lists their batted ball data: </p>
<p>GB 55.9% (1/30)<br />
FB 28.7% (30/30)<br />
LD 15.4% (23/30)</p>
<p>So they&#8217;ve hit the highest percentage of ground balls, but the fewest fly balls (of which only 4.7% have been HR)&#8230; and not very many line drives. No wonder they&#8217;ve been so boring to watch/follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sommer</title>
		<link>http://gashousegraphs.com/2011/04/06/games-5-6-analytics/#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sommer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 01:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gashousegraphs.com/?p=3047#comment-697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I&#039;m comfortable giving the offense a little while before I get too concerned.  Adding Holliday and really Pujols is bound to help.  I think Berkman can keep getting on base and there&#039;s no reason Colby can&#039;t keep this up... That&#039;s a solid 4.  At least one or two of the rest are bound to have decent years if only by luck alone...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;m comfortable giving the offense a little while before I get too concerned.  Adding Holliday and really Pujols is bound to help.  I think Berkman can keep getting on base and there&#8217;s no reason Colby can&#8217;t keep this up&#8230; That&#8217;s a solid 4.  At least one or two of the rest are bound to have decent years if only by luck alone&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
