<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trying To Be Objective About Colby Rasmus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gashousegraphs.com/2011/07/24/trying-to-be-objective-about-colby-rasmus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gashousegraphs.com/2011/07/24/trying-to-be-objective-about-colby-rasmus/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:52:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://gashousegraphs.com/2011/07/24/trying-to-be-objective-about-colby-rasmus/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gashousegraphs.com/?p=3332#comment-828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Appreciate the comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciate the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie</title>
		<link>http://gashousegraphs.com/2011/07/24/trying-to-be-objective-about-colby-rasmus/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gashousegraphs.com/?p=3332#comment-827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this about sums everything up: &quot;It’s just that their financial obligation towards him is so small that he doesn’t have to perform at an all-star level in order for him to be valuable in terms of cost-efficient roster management.&quot; Some guys take longer to develop than others. Colby has a lot to learn, but no one questions his talent. I think you have to give him another year or two before just giving up on him.

Glad to see some action back on Gas House Graphs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this about sums everything up: &#8220;It’s just that their financial obligation towards him is so small that he doesn’t have to perform at an all-star level in order for him to be valuable in terms of cost-efficient roster management.&#8221; Some guys take longer to develop than others. Colby has a lot to learn, but no one questions his talent. I think you have to give him another year or two before just giving up on him.</p>
<p>Glad to see some action back on Gas House Graphs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
